FASAB Standard S-56: A Shift Toward Greater Government Secrecy?
A little-known accounting standard issued by the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has sparked concerns about transparency in government financial reporting. Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards 56 (SFFAS 56), commonly referred to as FASAB S-56, allows U.S. government agencies to modify or withhold financial statements from public disclosure for national security reasons.

What is FASAB S-56?
Adopted in October 2018, FASAB S-56 introduced new guidelines enabling federal agencies to classify financial transactions, shift budget allocations, or even omit certain financial activities from publicly available reports. It applies to federal entities engaged in classified programs, particularly those involving defense, intelligence, and national security operations.
Under the new standard, agencies can use “modified” financial reporting, meaning actual expenditures or assets may be obscured or redirected in official statements to prevent disclosure of sensitive activities. The Department of Defense (DoD) and intelligence agencies were key proponents of the measure, arguing that full transparency could expose critical national security operations.
Transparency vs. Security
Critics argue that S-56 creates a loophole that could be used to hide significant amounts of government spending, making it difficult for watchdog groups, lawmakers, and taxpayers to track the real costs of military and intelligence operations. The standard essentially allows the government to maintain “undisclosed” ledgers for certain expenditures, raising concerns about accountability.
Former government officials and transparency advocates warn that the policy could be misused to cover up mismanagement, fraud, or unauthorized programs. “This opens the door for a shadow budget that the public has no way to audit,” said John Hudak, a governance expert at the Brookings Institution. “If an agency can legally manipulate financial reports under the guise of national security, it undermines the very purpose of public financial oversight.”
Government Justification
Supporters of the measure argue that S-56 is necessary in an era of heightened global threats. They claim that adversaries could exploit financial disclosures to gain intelligence on military and covert operations.
The FASAB, which operates under the authority of the U.S. Treasury, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), maintains that the standard aligns with long-standing practices of classified government spending, such as black budgets for intelligence and defense projects.
Potential Implications
The adoption of FASAB S-56 has raised broader concerns about the balance between national security and democratic accountability. Critics fear that expanding financial secrecy could set a precedent for other areas of government, making it more difficult to track wasteful spending or corruption.
Given the growing scrutiny of federal spending, particularly in areas of defense and intelligence, lawmakers and advocacy groups may push for greater oversight mechanisms to ensure that classified expenditures remain within legal and ethical boundaries.
For now, FASAB S-56 remains in effect, shielding an unknown portion of the federal budget from public view. Whether it strengthens national security or undermines public trust remains a contentious issue.
Conclusion
As concerns over government accountability and transparency continue to mount, FASAB S-56 remains a focal point in the debate over classified financial reporting. While national security is a legitimate concern, critics warn that unchecked secrecy could lead to financial abuses with little recourse for public oversight.
Read more here- https://sgp.fas.org/news/secrecy/2018/10/100918.html

More Stories
Why a Large U.S. BTC Reserve Could Be a Bad Idea?
Global Gold Fever!
Mexico Authorizes U.S. Special Forces to Combat Cartels