RFK Jr. Removes All CDC Vaccine Advisory Board Members

RFK Jr. Disbands Federal Vaccine Review Panel Amid Rising Scrutiny of Vaccine Safety and Transparency

June 10, 2025 – Washington, D.C. — In a major move shaking up U.S. public health oversight, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has formally dissolved the federal Vaccine Review Panel, pledging to rebuild it with “independent scientists, whistleblowers, and public health experts free of pharmaceutical industry influence.” The decision is being hailed by some as a long-overdue effort at restoring trust in medical science — and condemned by others as a politically charged act that undermines established health institutions.

Why the Panel Was Disbanded

According to administration officials, Kennedy was motivated by years of concerns about conflicts of interest between regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry. “Americans deserve vaccine policies that are guided by rigorous, unbiased science,” Kennedy said in a press statement. “The current review process is riddled with influence from corporate interests, and the people have lost faith in what they’re being told.”

Kennedy, a longtime critic of vaccine safety protocols, has emphasized that this is not an “anti-vaccine” stance, but a call for “transparent science and individual choice.” He cited issues with the speed of COVID-19 vaccine development, undisclosed ingredients, and long-term health effects that he claims have been underreported or ignored.

Vaccines and Controversial Ingredients

A central part of the debate revolves around ingredients such as aluminum adjuvants, mercury-derived preservatives like thimerosal (still used in some flu vaccines), and other potentially toxic compounds used to stimulate immune response. Critics argue these substances have been linked to neurological, immunological, and developmental disorders in vulnerable populations — especially children.

Proponents of vaccine safety counter that these ingredients are present in minuscule, regulated doses and are backed by decades of research confirming their safety. Nonetheless, a growing number of scientists and physicians have begun to question whether cumulative exposure, genetic factors, or other environmental triggers are being adequately studied.

COVID-19 Vaccines and Unanswered Questions

The COVID-19 vaccines — developed in record time through emergency authorizations — are perhaps the most polarizing example in recent memory. While they were initially credited with reducing hospitalizations and deaths, a growing contingent of scientists and public health officials are raising questions about long-term side effects, including myocarditis, menstrual irregularities, neurological symptoms, and immune dysfunction.

Adding fuel to the controversy, several international investigations — including some from former military intelligence officials — have explored whether the virus itself may have originated from a lab-based bioweapons program. Though the “bioweapon” classification remains contentious and unconfirmed at the highest levels, the narrative has resonated with Kennedy’s base, further amplifying calls for new vaccine oversight.

Nanotechnology and Edible Vaccine Concerns

Emerging technologies have added further complexity to the vaccine debate. Nanoparticles, lipid-based carriers, and mRNA delivery systems — originally developed for targeted drug delivery — have now become common in advanced vaccines. Critics argue that nanotechnology may introduce untested effects on the human immune system, particularly when particles cross the blood-brain barrier or accumulate in organs over time. The lack of long-term nanotoxicology studies has only deepened concerns.

Additionally, the concept of edible vaccines — genetically modifying plants such as tomatoes, lettuce, or bananas to express viral proteins — has entered early-stage research, with some companies reportedly testing these methods as part of food-based immunization programs. While proponents hail it as a breakthrough in global health, critics warn it may bypass informed consent, blur the line between medicine and nutrition, and introduce vaccines into the food chain without transparent public discussion or labeling requirements.

HPV and Other Vaccine Controversies

Beyond COVID-19, scrutiny is also mounting around the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil. While it’s promoted as a powerful tool to prevent cervical and other cancers, critics cite thousands of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) documenting autoimmune reactions, chronic fatigue, and neurological complications post-vaccination — especially in teenage girls.

Other vaccine concerns Kennedy has highlighted include:

• The expansion of mandatory childhood immunization schedules without sufficient long-term studies on the combined effects.
• Alleged suppression of dissenting voices in scientific journals.
• The lack of placebo-controlled studies for certain vaccines due to ethical and procedural limitations.

Global Scientific Dissent

Thousands of medical professionals and researchers worldwide have voiced concerns over vaccine safety and policy in recent years. Organizations such as the World Council for Health and the Great Barrington Declaration have criticized pandemic-era mandates and emphasized the importance of natural immunity, early treatment options, and medical freedom.

Still, mainstream medical institutions like the CDC, WHO, and FDA maintain that the overall benefit-risk ratio of vaccines remains overwhelmingly positive.

Where Vaccines Make Sense

Most experts — even many critics — agree that vaccines have historically played a vital role in combating diseases like polio, smallpox, measles, and tetanus. In these cases, the pathogen was well understood, transmission was predictable, and vaccines showed clear long-term efficacy and safety.

Effective vaccine programs typically share these traits:

• Transparent risk-benefit analysis.
• Independent oversight and peer-reviewed data.
• Informed consent and voluntary participation.

A Vision for the Future of Public Health

Kennedy’s administration has proposed the following steps as part of its reformed public health strategy:

• Rebuilding the vaccine panel with nonpartisan scientists.
• Creating a national vaccine injury compensation database with full transparency.
• Funding alternative research into immunity, including nutrition, detoxification, and early treatment protocols.
• Revisiting and potentially reforming the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which shields vaccine makers from liability.

In Kennedy’s words: “We must protect the public, but we must also protect the truth. Only by doing both can we restore confidence in medicine and build a healthier, freer society.”

---

Editor’s Note: This article includes claims and viewpoints from both government and scientific sources as well as dissenting perspectives. Readers are encouraged to consult a range of experts and official guidance when making health decisions.